<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1433 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348676</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue against an Order-in-Appeal was dismissed as not maintainable under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to decide on the loss of petroleum products on storage case, as per the specific provisions of Section 35B. The decision was finalized in open court, affirming that the appeal was not entertainable due to jurisdictional constraints.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 09:12:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1433 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348676</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue against an Order-in-Appeal was dismissed as not maintainable under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to decide on the loss of petroleum products on storage case, as per the specific provisions of Section 35B. The decision was finalized in open court, affirming that the appeal was not entertainable due to jurisdictional constraints.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>