<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1429 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348672</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand related to left-out material invoking an extended period of limitation, along with the penalty imposed on the appellant, as there was no suppression of facts. However, the confirmation of demand on the classification issue for the normal period was upheld. The appeal was disposed of with the judgment pronounced on 15.09.2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 11:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1429 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348672</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand related to left-out material invoking an extended period of limitation, along with the penalty imposed on the appellant, as there was no suppression of facts. However, the confirmation of demand on the classification issue for the normal period was upheld. The appeal was disposed of with the judgment pronounced on 15.09.2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>