https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348663 Writ petitions challenging orders passed under Section 39(2) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 were not entertained because an efficacious statutory appellate remedy was available. The Court accepted that the proper forum was the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal and directed the petitioners to pursue that remedy instead of invoking writ jurisdiction. It further required the Tribunal to decide the appeals independently and expeditiously, without being influenced by earlier observations made in similar matters. The result was relegation to the statutory appellate process, with no consideration of the merits in writ proceedings. en-us Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Sep 2017 09:11:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348663 Writ petitions challenging orders passed under Section 39(2) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 were not entertained because an efficacious statutory appellate remedy was available. The Court accepted that the proper forum was the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal and directed the petitioners to pursue that remedy instead of invoking writ jurisdiction. It further required the Tribunal to decide the appeals independently and expeditiously, without being influenced by earlier observations made in similar matters. The result was relegation to the statutory appellate process, with no consideration of the merits in writ proceedings. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348663