<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Learning from a case of un-necessary litigation by assessee- just to challenge, in any how and any way manner validity of notice is not proper</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=7632</link>
    <description>The assessing officer obtained registrar records and co-owner assessment documents showing the assessee sold her half-share and received proceeds; these constituted tangible material justifying reasons for reopening. The assessee had filed no return for the year and had not disclosed the sale or claimed non-taxability; instead of filing a return and making claims, she challenged the notice. Courts found that where the officer has tangible material to form a bonafide belief that income escaped assessment, the notice for reassessment is valid and the proper course for the assessee is to file a return and raise contentions during assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 09:07:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 09:07:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Learning from a case of un-necessary litigation by assessee- just to challenge, in any how and any way manner validity of notice is not proper</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=7632</link>
      <description>The assessing officer obtained registrar records and co-owner assessment documents showing the assessee sold her half-share and received proceeds; these constituted tangible material justifying reasons for reopening. The assessee had filed no return for the year and had not disclosed the sale or claimed non-taxability; instead of filing a return and making claims, she challenged the notice. Courts found that where the officer has tangible material to form a bonafide belief that income escaped assessment, the notice for reassessment is valid and the proper course for the assessee is to file a return and raise contentions during assessment.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 09:07:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=7632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>