<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 19 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10045</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to disallow lease rent paid to a sister concern, finding the transactions were not genuine and aimed at diverting profits. The Court noted the lack of evidence supporting a business purpose and concluded no substantial legal question arose. Additionally, the Court clarified the Assessing Officer could reassess the lease rent&#039;s admissibility in subsequent years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 19 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10045</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to disallow lease rent paid to a sister concern, finding the transactions were not genuine and aimed at diverting profits. The Court noted the lack of evidence supporting a business purpose and concluded no substantial legal question arose. Additionally, the Court clarified the Assessing Officer could reassess the lease rent&#039;s admissibility in subsequent years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>