<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 1145 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194775</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the judgment of the Single Judge in a writ petition, directing the department to hand over seized goods or their equivalent value to the petitioner and refund the deposited amount with interest. The Court found the department&#039;s arguments unpersuasive, confirming the market value provided by the parties. The Commissioner of Customs was ordered to refund the specified amount within two months, with the department instructed to refund the pre-deposit amount with interest. Failure to comply would result in additional interest. The appeal and application were disposed of with the appellant directed to adhere to the refund directives.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 10:35:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 1145 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194775</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the judgment of the Single Judge in a writ petition, directing the department to hand over seized goods or their equivalent value to the petitioner and refund the deposited amount with interest. The Court found the department&#039;s arguments unpersuasive, confirming the market value provided by the parties. The Commissioner of Customs was ordered to refund the specified amount within two months, with the department instructed to refund the pre-deposit amount with interest. Failure to comply would result in additional interest. The appeal and application were disposed of with the appellant directed to adhere to the refund directives.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>