https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194778 Section 45 of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act imposed restrictive bail conditions, but the Court read that embargo in context and held that the bail-stage satisfaction under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure does not require proof beyond reasonable doubt. The applicant was not named in the original report, had later been shown in custody, and the Court treated parity with the principal accused and similarly placed co-accused as relevant. As cognizance had already been taken and continued detention was viewed as punitive, the application for bail was allowed. en-us Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Sep 2017 10:35:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194778 Section 45 of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act imposed restrictive bail conditions, but the Court read that embargo in context and held that the bail-stage satisfaction under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure does not require proof beyond reasonable doubt. The applicant was not named in the original report, had later been shown in custody, and the Court treated parity with the principal accused and similarly placed co-accused as relevant. As cognizance had already been taken and continued detention was viewed as punitive, the application for bail was allowed. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194778