<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1404 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348647</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee for both assessment years, finding that the Assessing Officer and the First Appellate Authority had not followed natural justice principles and had made additions based on insufficient evidence. The Tribunal reversed the FAA&#039;s order in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that its decision was specific to the case at hand and not a precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 07:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1404 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348647</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee for both assessment years, finding that the Assessing Officer and the First Appellate Authority had not followed natural justice principles and had made additions based on insufficient evidence. The Tribunal reversed the FAA&#039;s order in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that its decision was specific to the case at hand and not a precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>