<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1400 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348643</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for fresh assessment after finding discrepancies in the Assessing Officer&#039;s findings and allowing the assessee a fair opportunity to prove the disputed additions related to alleged bogus purchases. The judgment primarily focused on the substantive issue of the disputed additions, rather than delving deeply into the challenges to assessment proceedings and notices raised by the Objectors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 07:55:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1400 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348643</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for fresh assessment after finding discrepancies in the Assessing Officer&#039;s findings and allowing the assessee a fair opportunity to prove the disputed additions related to alleged bogus purchases. The judgment primarily focused on the substantive issue of the disputed additions, rather than delving deeply into the challenges to assessment proceedings and notices raised by the Objectors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>