<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1380 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348623</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that room rent collected by the appellant should not be taxed under Mandap Keeper Service based on legal precedents and previous decisions. The demand for the extended period was deemed unsustainable due to past settlements, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeal on both merit and limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2018 10:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1380 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348623</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that room rent collected by the appellant should not be taxed under Mandap Keeper Service based on legal precedents and previous decisions. The demand for the extended period was deemed unsustainable due to past settlements, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeal on both merit and limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>