<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1376 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348619</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition seeking interest on refunded excise duty, as the unamended Section 35FF applied to the case where the refund was made within three months of the appellate order. Since the refund was timely and not delayed, no interest was deemed payable as compensation for any undue delay in the refund process. The final order on refund without interest, accepted without objection, was upheld as no specific provision mandated interest for the custody period under the Central Excise Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 07:53:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1376 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348619</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition seeking interest on refunded excise duty, as the unamended Section 35FF applied to the case where the refund was made within three months of the appellate order. Since the refund was timely and not delayed, no interest was deemed payable as compensation for any undue delay in the refund process. The final order on refund without interest, accepted without objection, was upheld as no specific provision mandated interest for the custody period under the Central Excise Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>