<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 17 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10039</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the assessee is entitled to a higher rate of depreciation on leased out trucks. The court emphasized that leasing a vehicle does not disqualify the assessee from claiming higher depreciation if the lessee has possession and the right to use the vehicle, along with payment for the lease. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the entitlement to the higher rate of depreciation on leased out trucks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 17 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10039</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the assessee is entitled to a higher rate of depreciation on leased out trucks. The court emphasized that leasing a vehicle does not disqualify the assessee from claiming higher depreciation if the lessee has possession and the right to use the vehicle, along with payment for the lease. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the entitlement to the higher rate of depreciation on leased out trucks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>