<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1367 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348610</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI allowed the appeal filed by cement manufacturers challenging duty demands and penalties imposed for availing concessional duty rates under Notification No. 4/2006-CE. The Tribunal considered the applicability of the notification, interpretation of its provisions, and relevant Tribunal decisions, including the Grasim Industries Ltd. case. Relying on the precedent decision in Grasim, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, granting the benefit of the notification to the assessees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 07:53:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1367 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348610</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI allowed the appeal filed by cement manufacturers challenging duty demands and penalties imposed for availing concessional duty rates under Notification No. 4/2006-CE. The Tribunal considered the applicability of the notification, interpretation of its provisions, and relevant Tribunal decisions, including the Grasim Industries Ltd. case. Relying on the precedent decision in Grasim, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, granting the benefit of the notification to the assessees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>