https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348605 Finished goods found in excess of the RG-I balance, together with the authorised signatory's admission and signed stock verification report, supported confiscation for breach of Central Excise Rules where the excess stock was not entered in the statutory register. The explanation offered did not dislodge the discrepancy. On the facts, confiscation was sustained, but the redemption fine and penalty were reduced because they were considered excessive in light of the overall circumstances and the quantum involved. en-us Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Sep 2017 07:53:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348605 Finished goods found in excess of the RG-I balance, together with the authorised signatory's admission and signed stock verification report, supported confiscation for breach of Central Excise Rules where the excess stock was not entered in the statutory register. The explanation offered did not dislodge the discrepancy. On the facts, confiscation was sustained, but the redemption fine and penalty were reduced because they were considered excessive in light of the overall circumstances and the quantum involved. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 28 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348605