<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1361 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348604</link>
    <description>The Court found the protective assessment order challenged by the petitioner to be withdrawn as re-assessment proceedings were initiated under Section 39(1) of the KVAT Act. Consequently, the Court deemed the writ petition infructuous and disposed of it. The petitioner was granted the liberty to participate in the re-assessment proceedings, raise objections, and was ensured a fair hearing by the respondent-authority, with orders to be passed in accordance with the law. No costs were awarded in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 07:52:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1361 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348604</link>
      <description>The Court found the protective assessment order challenged by the petitioner to be withdrawn as re-assessment proceedings were initiated under Section 39(1) of the KVAT Act. Consequently, the Court deemed the writ petition infructuous and disposed of it. The petitioner was granted the liberty to participate in the re-assessment proceedings, raise objections, and was ensured a fair hearing by the respondent-authority, with orders to be passed in accordance with the law. No costs were awarded in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348604</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>