<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1358 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348601</link>
    <description>In bail proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, the note explains that Section 45(1) is assessed on broad probabilities from the material on record and does not require a conclusive finding of innocence at the bail stage. It also notes that Section 19 requires possession of material and recorded reasons to believe before arrest, while Section 24 governs the burden of proof regarding proceeds of crime. On the facts described, the applicant had cooperated with the investigating agency, the complaint was already filed, and the record did not disclose cogent justification for continued detention; bail was therefore granted on those materials.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 07:52:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1358 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348601</link>
      <description>In bail proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, the note explains that Section 45(1) is assessed on broad probabilities from the material on record and does not require a conclusive finding of innocence at the bail stage. It also notes that Section 19 requires possession of material and recorded reasons to believe before arrest, while Section 24 governs the burden of proof regarding proceeds of crime. On the facts described, the applicant had cooperated with the investigating agency, the complaint was already filed, and the record did not disclose cogent justification for continued detention; bail was therefore granted on those materials.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>