https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194768 The Supreme Court held that the notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act does not need to specify whether the land is arable or waste. It ruled that the notification's purpose is to inform the public about the land's need for a public purpose, authorize state officers to enter the land, and notify the owner of the State's rights post-notification. The Court also found that the land in question, despite being in an urban area, was capable of cultivation and thus considered arable. Ultimately, the Court allowed the appeal, upholding the validity of the acquisition proceedings and dismissing the writ petition without costs. en-us Thu, 12 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Sep 2017 18:15:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194768 The Supreme Court held that the notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act does not need to specify whether the land is arable or waste. It ruled that the notification's purpose is to inform the public about the land's need for a public purpose, authorize state officers to enter the land, and notify the owner of the State's rights post-notification. The Court also found that the land in question, despite being in an urban area, was capable of cultivation and thus considered arable. Ultimately, the Court allowed the appeal, upholding the validity of the acquisition proceedings and dismissing the writ petition without costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 12 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194768