<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 12 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10031</link>
    <description>HC upheld Tribunal&#039;s finding that the assessee&#039;s deduction under section 36(1)(viia) is limited to the provision actually made (Rs. 1,19,36,000). The court held the statutory language is clear and admits no other interpretation, hence the deduction cannot exceed the provision and no substantial question of law arises for the HC&#039;s consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 20:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 12 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10031</link>
      <description>HC upheld Tribunal&#039;s finding that the assessee&#039;s deduction under section 36(1)(viia) is limited to the provision actually made (Rs. 1,19,36,000). The court held the statutory language is clear and admits no other interpretation, hence the deduction cannot exceed the provision and no substantial question of law arises for the HC&#039;s consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>