https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194759 The dispute over the remaining Cenvat credit claim was sent back for limited reconsideration because fresh evidence from the appellant was required before the claim could be decided. The Commissioner (Appeals) was directed to re-examine only the balance credit issue on that evidentiary basis. en-us Sat, 08 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Sep 2017 10:35:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194759 The dispute over the remaining Cenvat credit claim was sent back for limited reconsideration because fresh evidence from the appellant was required before the claim could be decided. The Commissioner (Appeals) was directed to re-examine only the balance credit issue on that evidentiary basis. Case-Laws Service Tax Sat, 08 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194759