<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1355 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348598</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeals challenging the disallowance of expenditure for Assessment Years 2006-07 and 2008-09. The disallowance was found to be unjustified as it was made on an ad hoc basis without proper justification, and no substantial question of law arose. Additionally, the treatment of website expenditure as revenue expenditure was upheld based on established precedent, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1355 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348598</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeals challenging the disallowance of expenditure for Assessment Years 2006-07 and 2008-09. The disallowance was found to be unjustified as it was made on an ad hoc basis without proper justification, and no substantial question of law arose. Additionally, the treatment of website expenditure as revenue expenditure was upheld based on established precedent, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>