<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1347 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348590</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, reversing the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on the depreciation disallowance. However, the Tribunal upheld the deletions regarding unexplained cash credits, building repair expenses, and unexplained cash deposits due to the assessee providing adequate documentation. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as they failed to provide contrary material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 07:21:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1347 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348590</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, reversing the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on the depreciation disallowance. However, the Tribunal upheld the deletions regarding unexplained cash credits, building repair expenses, and unexplained cash deposits due to the assessee providing adequate documentation. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as they failed to provide contrary material.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>