<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1341 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348584</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s cross objection, directing the addition of 8% profit from alleged bogus purchases to be reduced from the work in progress value instead of being assessed during the relevant year. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering the profit element in such cases and adjusting it appropriately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 07:20:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1341 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348584</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s cross objection, directing the addition of 8% profit from alleged bogus purchases to be reduced from the work in progress value instead of being assessed during the relevant year. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering the profit element in such cases and adjusting it appropriately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>