<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1332 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348575</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA upheld the Commissioner(Appeals) decisions challenged by the Revenue, dismissing the appeal. The Tribunal affirmed the orders for Denovo Adjudication, redemption fine reduction to Rs. 30,000 without specifying mitigating factors, and the release of 13 pieces of gold without foreign markings. The Tribunal found the remand for further inquiry reasonable, rejected the Revenue&#039;s arguments on tampering, and emphasized the lack of evidence supporting the Revenue&#039;s claims. The Tribunal cited relevant case law and decisions to support its conclusion, ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal on all issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 07:20:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1332 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348575</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA upheld the Commissioner(Appeals) decisions challenged by the Revenue, dismissing the appeal. The Tribunal affirmed the orders for Denovo Adjudication, redemption fine reduction to Rs. 30,000 without specifying mitigating factors, and the release of 13 pieces of gold without foreign markings. The Tribunal found the remand for further inquiry reasonable, rejected the Revenue&#039;s arguments on tampering, and emphasized the lack of evidence supporting the Revenue&#039;s claims. The Tribunal cited relevant case law and decisions to support its conclusion, ultimately dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal on all issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>