<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1331 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348574</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the petition as the petitioner failed to substantiate allegations of oppression, mismanagement, and forgery. No grounds were found to order an investigation under Section 237 of the Companies Act, 1956, as the petitioner did not establish fraudulent activities. The tribunal noted the petitioner&#039;s previous legal actions on similar grounds and concluded that the claims lacked merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 07:20:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1331 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348574</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the petition as the petitioner failed to substantiate allegations of oppression, mismanagement, and forgery. No grounds were found to order an investigation under Section 237 of the Companies Act, 1956, as the petitioner did not establish fraudulent activities. The tribunal noted the petitioner&#039;s previous legal actions on similar grounds and concluded that the claims lacked merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348574</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>