<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1329 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348572</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed in the case regarding service tax demand under the Cargo Handling Service category for specific works executed. The Tribunal held that coal extraction is considered a mining activity and not subject to service tax before 1/6/2007. Mechanical transfer and transportation of coal within mines were also not considered Cargo Handling Services. However, hiring pay loaders for transferring goods from Railway siding to wagons was deemed a cargo handling service, upholding the tax liability for this activity. The matter was remanded for re-quantifying the demand and penalties based on the specific nature of activities and their classification under relevant tax categories.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 14:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1329 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348572</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed in the case regarding service tax demand under the Cargo Handling Service category for specific works executed. The Tribunal held that coal extraction is considered a mining activity and not subject to service tax before 1/6/2007. Mechanical transfer and transportation of coal within mines were also not considered Cargo Handling Services. However, hiring pay loaders for transferring goods from Railway siding to wagons was deemed a cargo handling service, upholding the tax liability for this activity. The matter was remanded for re-quantifying the demand and penalties based on the specific nature of activities and their classification under relevant tax categories.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>