<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1324 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348567</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, determining that the refund claimed was not subject to Section 11B limitations as the amount was not considered tax. The impugned orders were set aside, and the jurisdictional Commissioner was directed to return the deposited amount to the appellant as per law. The judgment was pronounced on 25.08.2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 07:19:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1324 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348567</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, determining that the refund claimed was not subject to Section 11B limitations as the amount was not considered tax. The impugned orders were set aside, and the jurisdictional Commissioner was directed to return the deposited amount to the appellant as per law. The judgment was pronounced on 25.08.2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>