<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1320 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348563</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, in a case involving a dispute over Service Tax payment. The appellant rectified the non-payment upon detection without evidence of intentional evasion, leading the Tribunal to conclude that the penalty was unjustified. The appeal was partially allowed, emphasizing the lack of materials supporting fraud or collusion in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 07:19:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490477" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1320 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348563</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, in a case involving a dispute over Service Tax payment. The appellant rectified the non-payment upon detection without evidence of intentional evasion, leading the Tribunal to conclude that the penalty was unjustified. The appeal was partially allowed, emphasizing the lack of materials supporting fraud or collusion in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>