<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1318 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348561</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the decision to allow Modvat Credit for duty paid on disputed capital goods/spares, including carding and combing machines, despite exclusions under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. Previous judgments supported the entitlement to such credit, emphasizing actual usage over technical classifications. The Court dismissed the appeal, highlighting the importance of considering the manufacturing process in determining eligibility for Modvat Credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2017 12:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1318 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348561</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the decision to allow Modvat Credit for duty paid on disputed capital goods/spares, including carding and combing machines, despite exclusions under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. Previous judgments supported the entitlement to such credit, emphasizing actual usage over technical classifications. The Court dismissed the appeal, highlighting the importance of considering the manufacturing process in determining eligibility for Modvat Credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>