https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348555 The adjudication was found to be incomplete because the transaction records and factual basis of the appellant's claim under the excise rules had not been properly examined. The existing reasoning was treated as insufficient since the factual position needed to be determined from the records before the relevant law and cited decisions could be applied. Fresh consideration was therefore required, and the appellant was to be given an opportunity of hearing. The matter was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for de novo adjudication. en-us Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Sep 2017 07:18:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348555 The adjudication was found to be incomplete because the transaction records and factual basis of the appellant's claim under the excise rules had not been properly examined. The existing reasoning was treated as insufficient since the factual position needed to be determined from the records before the relevant law and cited decisions could be applied. Fresh consideration was therefore required, and the appellant was to be given an opportunity of hearing. The matter was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for de novo adjudication. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348555