<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1309 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348552</link>
    <description>Waste and scrap cleared from a factory was held not to qualify for exemption under Notification No. 89/95-CE where the same factory also manufactured other excisable goods, because the notification&#039;s plain terms confined the benefit to factories not producing such goods. The demand was therefore sustained. Penalty was also maintained since the manufacturer had been repeatedly cautioned, yet kept no records and did not follow excise procedure; the argument that the issue was only one of interpretation was rejected because the notification was found clear and unambiguous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 07:18:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1309 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348552</link>
      <description>Waste and scrap cleared from a factory was held not to qualify for exemption under Notification No. 89/95-CE where the same factory also manufactured other excisable goods, because the notification&#039;s plain terms confined the benefit to factories not producing such goods. The demand was therefore sustained. Penalty was also maintained since the manufacturer had been repeatedly cautioned, yet kept no records and did not follow excise procedure; the argument that the issue was only one of interpretation was rejected because the notification was found clear and unambiguous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>