<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1307 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348550</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that tax credit under Section 11(3)(b) of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act should be reduced by 4% under both sub-clauses (ii) and (iii). The Court clarified that the reduction should apply in both circumstances as the legislature intended, with the limitation that the reduction cannot exceed the VAT paid. The decision overturned the High Court&#039;s ruling and emphasized the specific application of the reduction provisions based on the goods involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1307 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348550</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that tax credit under Section 11(3)(b) of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act should be reduced by 4% under both sub-clauses (ii) and (iii). The Court clarified that the reduction should apply in both circumstances as the legislature intended, with the limitation that the reduction cannot exceed the VAT paid. The decision overturned the High Court&#039;s ruling and emphasized the specific application of the reduction provisions based on the goods involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>