https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10023 The court dismissed the suit and applications filed by GVFL, upheld the TRO's order, and directed immediate delivery of possession to the auction purchasers. The court found that the lease agreements were sham transactions and that GVFL was in possession of the property on behalf of the defaulter, SFL. The civil suit and writ petition were not maintainable under the relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act and ITCP Rules. en-us Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Jul 2017 14:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10023 The court dismissed the suit and applications filed by GVFL, upheld the TRO's order, and directed immediate delivery of possession to the auction purchasers. The court found that the lease agreements were sham transactions and that GVFL was in possession of the property on behalf of the defaulter, SFL. The civil suit and writ petition were not maintainable under the relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act and ITCP Rules. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 05 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10023