<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1301 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348544</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the petitions challenging E-auction Notifications regarding the GST rate on scrap buses as premature. It clarified that the GST rate was not definitively set at 28% in the Notice and advised the petitioners to participate in the tender process to resolve GST rate queries through appropriate channels. The Court emphasized the availability of mechanisms for determining tax liability and highlighted the need for petitioners to address concerns regarding Advance Ruling Authorities with the government.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 16:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1301 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348544</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the petitions challenging E-auction Notifications regarding the GST rate on scrap buses as premature. It clarified that the GST rate was not definitively set at 28% in the Notice and advised the petitioners to participate in the tender process to resolve GST rate queries through appropriate channels. The Court emphasized the availability of mechanisms for determining tax liability and highlighted the need for petitioners to address concerns regarding Advance Ruling Authorities with the government.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>