<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1298 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348541</link>
    <description>HC held the assessment had to be completed within the time limit of s.153(2A). Where the AO failed to complete proceedings within that period after limited remand, the notice dated 14 Sept 2015 and consequential proceedings, including the order dated 2 Dec 2015, were set aside. The Supreme Court analysis cited by Revenue was deemed inapplicable to s.153(2A). Decision rendered in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 10:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1298 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348541</link>
      <description>HC held the assessment had to be completed within the time limit of s.153(2A). Where the AO failed to complete proceedings within that period after limited remand, the notice dated 14 Sept 2015 and consequential proceedings, including the order dated 2 Dec 2015, were set aside. The Supreme Court analysis cited by Revenue was deemed inapplicable to s.153(2A). Decision rendered in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>