<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1286 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348529</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act amounting to Rs. 4,04,635, as it found that the assessee&#039;s actions were not contumacious and there was no intention to conceal income. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, citing the lack of material evidence to support the allegations of inaccurate particulars or income concealment. The penalty was deleted, and the appeal was allowed on 21/09/2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2017 10:40:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1286 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348529</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act amounting to Rs. 4,04,635, as it found that the assessee&#039;s actions were not contumacious and there was no intention to conceal income. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, citing the lack of material evidence to support the allegations of inaccurate particulars or income concealment. The penalty was deleted, and the appeal was allowed on 21/09/2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>