https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348517 The appellant successfully appealed against the differential duty demand on unutilized imported Crude Palm Oil. The CESTAT Chennai ruled in favor of the appellant, considering the minimal percentage of unutilized quantity and legal precedents indicating that differential duty is not recoverable in cases of loss beyond the importer's control. The appellant's argument regarding loss during transit was supported by previous tribunal decisions and legal precedents, leading to the grant of consequential relief as per the law. en-us Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Sep 2017 10:39:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348517 The appellant successfully appealed against the differential duty demand on unutilized imported Crude Palm Oil. The CESTAT Chennai ruled in favor of the appellant, considering the minimal percentage of unutilized quantity and legal precedents indicating that differential duty is not recoverable in cases of loss beyond the importer's control. The appellant's argument regarding loss during transit was supported by previous tribunal decisions and legal precedents, leading to the grant of consequential relief as per the law. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348517