https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348510 The Supreme Court's ability to entertain an application to make an arbitral award a rule of the Court, while it continues to retain seisin over the arbitral proceedings, was identified as the central issue. The document records that the question was not finally decided at this stage and was referred to a larger Bench for determination. No substantive ruling on maintainability or jurisdiction is stated in the supplied text. en-us Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Sep 2017 10:37:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348510 The Supreme Court's ability to entertain an application to make an arbitral award a rule of the Court, while it continues to retain seisin over the arbitral proceedings, was identified as the central issue. The document records that the question was not finally decided at this stage and was referred to a larger Bench for determination. No substantive ruling on maintainability or jurisdiction is stated in the supplied text. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348510