<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1264 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348507</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, a Custom House Agent, in a case concerning the demand of service tax on additional charges beyond agency fees. The Tribunal held that the additional charges were reimbursements for third-party services and not subject to service tax under CHA services. Similarly, in a separate issue regarding Business Auxiliary Services, the Tribunal found that the markup on space purchased from airlines and shipping lines did not constitute taxable services under BAS. The Tribunal set aside the demand for service tax, citing precedents in the Appellant&#039;s favor and granting consequential benefits as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2017 12:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490374" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1264 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348507</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, a Custom House Agent, in a case concerning the demand of service tax on additional charges beyond agency fees. The Tribunal held that the additional charges were reimbursements for third-party services and not subject to service tax under CHA services. Similarly, in a separate issue regarding Business Auxiliary Services, the Tribunal found that the markup on space purchased from airlines and shipping lines did not constitute taxable services under BAS. The Tribunal set aside the demand for service tax, citing precedents in the Appellant&#039;s favor and granting consequential benefits as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>