<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1243 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194753</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal concerning the deduction under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It held that the date of possession, 11.09.2009, should be considered for the deduction, as it fell within the prescribed time limit. This decision overturned the rulings of the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A), granting the assessee the entitlement to the deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 14:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1243 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194753</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal concerning the deduction under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It held that the date of possession, 11.09.2009, should be considered for the deduction, as it fell within the prescribed time limit. This decision overturned the rulings of the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A), granting the assessee the entitlement to the deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>