<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1439 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194755</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision against the Revenue, dismissing the appeal. The case involved challenges to a common judgment on substantial questions of law under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, regarding deduction of interest, applicability of previous judgments, and machinery repair expenses. The court found in favor of the Assessee based on a previous judgment, determining that the issue was already settled for an earlier assessment year. The court also ruled that previous judgments cited were not applicable to the current case due to significant factual differences. The appeal was ultimately dismissed in favor of the Assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2017 10:35:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1439 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194755</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision against the Revenue, dismissing the appeal. The case involved challenges to a common judgment on substantial questions of law under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, regarding deduction of interest, applicability of previous judgments, and machinery repair expenses. The court found in favor of the Assessee based on a previous judgment, determining that the issue was already settled for an earlier assessment year. The court also ruled that previous judgments cited were not applicable to the current case due to significant factual differences. The appeal was ultimately dismissed in favor of the Assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>