https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348498 Criminal complaints under Central Excise law are not liable to be quashed merely because the adjudication order has been remanded for re-quantification of duty. Where the demand was not set aside in toto and the complaint was supported by allegations that goods were found unrecorded or misdescribed in the factory, adjudication and criminal prosecution could proceed independently. The finding in adjudication was not binding on the criminal court, and no exceptional ground was shown for interference at the stage of charge. The petition seeking quashing of the complaint, charge and connected proceedings was rejected. en-us Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Feb 2018 10:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348498 Criminal complaints under Central Excise law are not liable to be quashed merely because the adjudication order has been remanded for re-quantification of duty. Where the demand was not set aside in toto and the complaint was supported by allegations that goods were found unrecorded or misdescribed in the factory, adjudication and criminal prosecution could proceed independently. The finding in adjudication was not binding on the criminal court, and no exceptional ground was shown for interference at the stage of charge. The petition seeking quashing of the complaint, charge and connected proceedings was rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348498