https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348497 The court set aside the Settlement Commission's order, ruling that the Petitioners' applications were maintainable as they were filed before the adjudication order was dispatched. The applications were restored for further proceedings from the stage they were at when the impugned order was passed. The writ petitions were allowed, and the applications were scheduled for further proceedings on 6th November 2017. en-us Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Apr 2018 11:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348497 The court set aside the Settlement Commission's order, ruling that the Petitioners' applications were maintainable as they were filed before the adjudication order was dispatched. The applications were restored for further proceedings from the stage they were at when the impugned order was passed. The writ petitions were allowed, and the applications were scheduled for further proceedings on 6th November 2017. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348497