<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1251 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348494</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of fraudulent CENVAT Credit and imposed penalties on involved parties due to irregularities in transportation documents. The investigation revealed fraudulent consignment notes and misuse of CENVAT Credit facility. Penalties were considered excessive in some cases and were reduced accordingly. Legal precedents supported the Tribunal&#039;s findings. The final decision required reversal of credit with interest, upheld penalties with modifications, and partially allowed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2017 10:34:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1251 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348494</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of fraudulent CENVAT Credit and imposed penalties on involved parties due to irregularities in transportation documents. The investigation revealed fraudulent consignment notes and misuse of CENVAT Credit facility. Penalties were considered excessive in some cases and were reduced accordingly. Legal precedents supported the Tribunal&#039;s findings. The final decision required reversal of credit with interest, upheld penalties with modifications, and partially allowed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>