<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1240 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348483</link>
    <description>The rental income from the Scindia House property was held to be taxable under &#039;income from house property&#039; and not &#039;business income&#039;. The property was not considered the Assessee&#039;s stock-in-trade, impacting its treatment for wealth tax purposes. The amendment to Section 40 (3) of the Finance Act, 1983 by the Finance Act, 1988 was deemed non-retrospective. The Court set aside previous orders and allowed the appeals, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 16:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1240 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348483</link>
      <description>The rental income from the Scindia House property was held to be taxable under &#039;income from house property&#039; and not &#039;business income&#039;. The property was not considered the Assessee&#039;s stock-in-trade, impacting its treatment for wealth tax purposes. The amendment to Section 40 (3) of the Finance Act, 1983 by the Finance Act, 1988 was deemed non-retrospective. The Court set aside previous orders and allowed the appeals, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>