<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (11) TMI 533 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194744</link>
    <description>The Court held that Directors cannot be held personally liable for a company&#039;s electricity dues unless explicitly provided by law. The doctrine of &quot;lifting the veil of the corporate body&quot; was deemed inapplicable without statutory support. The term &quot;consumer&quot; referred to the company, not its Directors. Recovery proceedings against former Directors were invalidated, and current Directors were not personally liable. Recovery proceedings against Directors&#039; personal assets were quashed, emphasizing the separation of company and Director liabilities. The writ petitions were allowed with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 15:45:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (11) TMI 533 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194744</link>
      <description>The Court held that Directors cannot be held personally liable for a company&#039;s electricity dues unless explicitly provided by law. The doctrine of &quot;lifting the veil of the corporate body&quot; was deemed inapplicable without statutory support. The term &quot;consumer&quot; referred to the company, not its Directors. Recovery proceedings against former Directors were invalidated, and current Directors were not personally liable. Recovery proceedings against Directors&#039; personal assets were quashed, emphasizing the separation of company and Director liabilities. The writ petitions were allowed with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>