<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant Liable for Import Duty on Software Ordered and Delivered by DHL; Considered the Importer.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=36389</link>
    <description>Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 11:53:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 11:53:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant Liable for Import Duty on Software Ordered and Delivered by DHL; Considered the Importer.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=36389</link>
      <description>Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 11:53:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=36389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>