<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1238 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348481</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC dismissed the appeal challenging the ITAT&#039;s decision to overturn the Commissioner&#039;s order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The HC found that the Commissioner&#039;s order lacked adequate reasoning and failed to meet the legal requirements for setting aside the assessment order. The court emphasized the necessity for the Commissioner to conduct an independent inquiry and provide explicit reasons for invoking Section 263. Consequently, the HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s conclusion, agreeing that the Commissioner&#039;s order was erroneous, and ruled there was no substantial question of law to address.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2024 12:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1238 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348481</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC dismissed the appeal challenging the ITAT&#039;s decision to overturn the Commissioner&#039;s order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The HC found that the Commissioner&#039;s order lacked adequate reasoning and failed to meet the legal requirements for setting aside the assessment order. The court emphasized the necessity for the Commissioner to conduct an independent inquiry and provide explicit reasons for invoking Section 263. Consequently, the HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s conclusion, agreeing that the Commissioner&#039;s order was erroneous, and ruled there was no substantial question of law to address.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>