<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1225 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348468</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the AO to re-examine and provide the assessee an opportunity to justify the disallowed expenses for traveling, advertisement, and sales promotion. The addition of interest income was upheld but allowed the assessee to avoid double taxation in the subsequent year. The appeal was disposed of with these directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 06:50:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1225 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348468</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the AO to re-examine and provide the assessee an opportunity to justify the disallowed expenses for traveling, advertisement, and sales promotion. The addition of interest income was upheld but allowed the assessee to avoid double taxation in the subsequent year. The appeal was disposed of with these directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>