<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1221 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348464</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objection. The deletion of interest disallowance under Rule 8D2(ii) was upheld, the administrative expenses disallowance under Rule 8D2(iii) was to be recomputed, and the reference to the DVO under Section 55A(b)(ii) was deemed invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 06:49:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=490229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1221 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348464</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objection. The deletion of interest disallowance under Rule 8D2(ii) was upheld, the administrative expenses disallowance under Rule 8D2(iii) was to be recomputed, and the reference to the DVO under Section 55A(b)(ii) was deemed invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>