https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348456 The court dismissed the petition challenging orders imposing penalties for failing to meet export obligations. The petitioner delayed challenging the orders, paid penalties without objection, and failed to avail alternate statutory remedies. The court emphasized the importance of timely action, noted the lack of justification for delays, and rejected the claim of payment under duress. Ultimately, the court found the penalties reasonable, barred relief under Article 226 due to the delay, and dismissed the petition. en-us Fri, 15 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Jun 2018 12:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348456 The court dismissed the petition challenging orders imposing penalties for failing to meet export obligations. The petitioner delayed challenging the orders, paid penalties without objection, and failed to avail alternate statutory remedies. The court emphasized the importance of timely action, noted the lack of justification for delays, and rejected the claim of payment under duress. Ultimately, the court found the penalties reasonable, barred relief under Article 226 due to the delay, and dismissed the petition. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 15 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348456